Oct 09 2009
∞
+
∞
Michelle: does this interest you? I can get us in for free. and if it’s boring we can leave and come back for the after party
me: dude its gonna be like nerd boy central. count. me. in.
Michelle: that is sooo true!!! ok I’ll rsvp! now I’m excited.
me: yesssssssssssssssss!
Michelle: the “interactive” after party is sponsored by a vodka company and is at the nintendo world store.
me: the nintendo setting could be like hotness kryptonite. but there will be vodka, so we may not notice.
You guys are mean! Why can’t I come?
+
∞
“ capture your bounty like elliot ness.
— Ms. Hill via Ready or Not - why do multiple rap songs rep E. Ness?
+
∞
thelonglistofthingsthatsuck:thekathunt:pootee: (via teenagejesus)
i want.
Oct 08 2009
∞
Count Down to NASA's LCROSS launching for Lunar Impact aka Boming the Moon
Why haven’t we heard more dissention? If you throw plastic away, you’re apt to get a 3 hour lecture about what you’re doing to the environment but NASA can BOMB THE MOON? I found one article where the author sounded somehow legitimate in his apprehension about this plan, then three paragraphs down his writing turns into a tirade about how this could negetively impact our future intergalactic space relationships. Count down to moon bombing now available!
+
∞
Harry Potter Vibrating Broom Stick via Time’s List of Dubious Toys
also on the list: A doll that breast feeds, Sasha and Malia Obama dolls, and Lego’s Terrorist action figure (which can be merchandised wonderfully with PlayMobil’s Airport Security Play Set - who wants a body cavity search?)
+
∞
regarding times list of dubious toys
- boss lady: well, who would buy a homeless doll?!
- me: I don't know.
- boss lady: American Girl, jumped the shark! Is Matl giving the profits away to help homeless children? That would make it tolerable.
- me: Are you still letting Bea get one for Christmas? Which one does she want?
- boss lady: Oh, I hope not Gwen. I think she wants Felicity. What's next on the list? Harry Potter viiibraating broo...(broom stick, that the child is supposed to stradle)...oh...oh!
- me: HELLS BELLS!
- (cackling ensues)
+
∞
Alexander McQueen Spring 2010
Ok, ok. I know that a lot of you all are going to call me a heretic and burn me at the stake for this but: I don’t like the McQueen heel of ‘10. Let’s put aside that it doesn’t look like it could be remotely comfortable; I have plenty of shoes I adore that offer me not an iota of comfort. Here is my jam: shoes are supposed to maginify the grace and elegance of the female form - especially heels and especially the stems. Heels, be they of the cone, kitten, stilletto or stacked variety, should elongate, accentuate and adorn a woman’s leg like an accent, not claw it off like an eyesore. I think these shoes stop the eye short, they’re jarring and I think they are down right awkward to look at. I know that a lot of things don’t make it from the runway to the ready-to-wear, I am not convinced that these were ever destined to hit shelves, but honestly these crab-people feet distracted me from even seening McQueens line outside of them.
